Return-Path: <no-reply@topsoe.com>
Received: from server.64xmedia.com
	by server.64xmedia.com with LMTP
	id LmayLNYF8mLAAQAAdUq3JA
	(envelope-from <no-reply@topsoe.com>); Tue, 09 Aug 2022 02:59:34 -0400
Return-path: <no-reply@topsoe.com>
Envelope-to: jlee@aicenergycorp.com,
 jmelk@aicenergycorp.com,
 jwilson@aicenergycorp.com,
 rgrimes@aicenergycorp.com,
 smelk@aicenergycorp.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 02:59:34 -0400
Received: from relay3.topsoe.dk ([85.129.89.238]:49788)
	by server.64xmedia.com with esmtps  (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
	(Exim 4.95)
	(envelope-from <no-reply@topsoe.com>)
	id 1oLJDB-00005s-Bd;
	Tue, 09 Aug 2022 02:59:34 -0400
Received: from relay3.topsoe.dk (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C1F7A094;
	Tue,  9 Aug 2022 08:57:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay3.topsoe.dk (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25637A07F;
	Tue,  9 Aug 2022 08:57:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from DKLYNEXCNOD03.topsoe.dk (unknown [172.25.235.4])
	by relay3.topsoe.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS;
	Tue,  9 Aug 2022 08:57:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from DKLYNEXCNOD01.topsoe.dk (172.25.235.2) by
 DKLYNEXCNOD03.topsoe.dk (172.25.235.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server
 (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id
 15.1.2242.12; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 08:57:30 +0200
Received: from DKCPHAPP001 (172.25.235.80) by DKLYNEXCNOD01.topsoe.dk
 (172.25.235.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2375.28 via Frontend
 Transport; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 08:57:30 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: "no-reply@topsoe.com" <no-reply@topsoe.com>
From: "no-reply@topsoe.com" <no-reply@topsoe.com>
To: <rgrimes@aicenergycorp.com>, <jwilson@aicenergycorp.com>,
	<jlee@aicenergycorp.com>, <jmelk@aicenergycorp.com>,
	<smelk@aicenergycorp.com>, <kkeller@keitu.com>
CC: <RAKH@topsoe.com>, <TASF@topsoe.com>,
	<S-10683.engineering@sharepoint.topsoe.com>, <magu@topsoe.com>,
	<tim.wells@englobal.com>, <eric.kahre@englobal.com>,
	<Trudy.Busby@englobal.com>
Reply-To: "no-reply@topsoe.com" <no-reply@topsoe.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 08:57:30 +0200
Subject: S-10683-HT-AIC-T-093 RFU Chemicals Summary Revised
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Message-ID: <c6530891-629a-4b82-9f0e-07d5ba0c8800@DKLYNEXCNOD01.topsoe.dk>
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-12.0.0.1220-8.600.1018-26686.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--1.756700-8.000000-31
X-TM-AS-MatchedID: 155766-111600-111604-702962-111605-111602-704363-106230-7
	02673-703674-112032-790015-700644-139705-101349-704314-113015-701430-780038
	-111603-111601-148004-148046-148133-10018-42000
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No
X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3
X-Spam-Score: 3
X-Spam-Bar: /
X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "server.64xmedia.com",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 root\@localhost for details.
 Content preview:  Roger Grimes, Jennifer Wilson, John Lee, John Melk, Snow Melk,
    Kris Keller Please find the latest transmittal S-10683-HT-AIC-T-093 from
   Haldor Topsøe on project S-10683 either by clicking the link below or by
   copying and pasting it into your browser: 
 Content analysis details:   (0.3 points, 3.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
  0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY         BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
                             blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: topsoe.dk]
  0.2 KAM_MANYTO             Email has more than one To Header or more than 25
                             recipients
 -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE   No description available.
  0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS       Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
                             Alignment
  0.0 AWL                    AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
X-Spam-Flag: NO
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